Odinga leads, but likely a second round is necessary
On 9 August 2022 Kenyan Presidential Elections take place. The two main candidates are opposition leader Raila Odonga, with support from president Kenyatta, and vice-president William Ruto. There are two other candidates: George Wajackoyah and David Waihiga Mwaure.
According to the most recent polls by TIFA research and Infotrak, it will be a neck and neck race between Odinga and Ruto. TIFA’s latest forecast is 47% for Odinga and 44% for Ruto. To win the presidency in the first round, at least 50% + 1 vote is needed. Whether or not a run-off is necessary will be partly decided by how many votes are taken by Wajackoyah and Waihiga Mwaure.
According to our survey among 450 random Kenyan WhatsApp users it will indeed be neck and neck.
Neither Odinga (49% +/- 4%) nor Ruto (45.6 +/- 4%) are forecasted to get a majority in the first round. The other candidates take 5.4% together, significantly more than in the TIFA forecast.
5% of our respondents indicated to be undecided. 4.5% indicated not to vote. 3.1% didn’t want to share their preference, of which 0.3% gave security as the reason for this. On top of this there was 1.9% insisting on payment which Afroopinion doesn’t do. (Afroopinion was also not paid to do this research)
Interesting about the Whatsapp methodology is that it allows us to record and make transparent why people choose a certain candidate or why they voted Odinga in 2017 but not now.
It should be noted that the scores of the candidates with other survey companies don’t add up to 100%. There is the habit, with which we disagree and break, to include ‘Undecided’ and ‘Non-response’ as separate categories in the addition to 100%. Undecided and Non-response are not possible outcomes listed on the official results of an election. We think it’s the task of survey companies to estimate as well as possible what percentage of the voters will vote for a certain candidate. If they suffer from non-response, then they have to review their procedures and get those non-response percentages down.
Non-response is also abused by some survey companies in other countries to justify surveys that totally wrongly predicted electoral preferences. Having done our first survey in Uganda, we recall how Afrobarometer, two days ahead of the 14 January 2021 elections, predicted a 3 to 1 win for general Museveni versus opposition leader Bobi Wine. When confronted with the official results, that are widely considered to be rigged, the win was not even 2 to 1, the scientists at Afrobarometer blamed it on the non-response of 21%. In this way surveys become non falsifiable, which essentially means that according to the famous Karl Popper theorem, they are not scientific.
It’s unfortunate that in dictatorships like Uganda and Zimbabwe there are very little serious surveys, and that’s why we created Afroopinion. When you can’t trust the officially announced results, you need a reliable reference. You need a survey that the government cannot influence. In her book “Another Fine Mess”, Helen Epstein describes how the Uganda government controls surveys. The surveys by Afroopinion are done through Whatsapp. Whatsapp conversations are encrypted end-to-end and the Afroopinion surveyors are outside of Africa, making it very hard to impossible for African governments to influence the results. Even in Kenya some respondents have fear for the consequence of sharing their opinion, although by far not es much as in Uganda & Zimbabwe.
Kenya is definitely ahead of Uganda and Zimbabwe when it comes to democracy, but that doesn’t mean Kenyans trust their democratic process. We actually asked Kenyan voters if they think that the IEBC will organize free & fair elections. 40% of our respondents have no trust in the IEBC. Among Odonga voters even a majority of 60% have that opinion, whereas only 18% of Ruto voters distrust the IEBC.
Demographical corrections
It’s common in field surveys that the locations are chosen such that a representative sample of the population is constructed. In the same way equal amounts of women and men are allowed to the poll. In the WANGI methodology we invite someone to participate in a survey without knowing in advance the residence or gender of this person. The sample may therefore not be representative of the full population and the raw results shown in the tables below have to be corrected for that.
| Odinga | Ruto | Other | |
| Raw sample | 50.2% | 43.6% | 6.4% |
| Male | 52.1% | 41.8% | 6.1% |
| Female | 43.6% | 50.9% | 5.5% |
| Kenya, gender weighted | 47.9% | 46.4% | 5.7% |
In the same way Whatsapp penetration and willingness to participate is not equal per region on Kenya. We get twice as many response from Nairobi than to be expected on the amount of registered voters. In Northern, we get twice as little. Since the Odinga & Ruto supporters are strongly concentrated in certain zones weighing of the zone results is important.
| Odinga | Ruto | Other | |
| Raw sample | 50.2% | 43.6 | 6.4% |
| Nairobi | 68% | 27% | 5% |
| Central Rift | 16% | 73% | 11% |
| Kenya, region weighted | 49.0% | 45.6% | 5.4% |
Our sample is not big enough to apply gender and zone correction at the same time. As regional differences are much bigger than gender differences, we have chosen to apply regional weights. Since all the results give Odinga as being in the lead and the difference between the two corrections is only 1% the effect of this choice is not drastic.
Looking back at 2017
We also asked our respondents how they voted in 2017. We found the following:
In the official results Kenyatta got 54%. There were multiple counties such as Nyandarua, Nyeri, Kirinyaga and Murang’a where he scored approximately 99%. In some of these counties our respondents tell us to have voted Odinga, sufficiently many to conclude that fraud did take place in these counties.
There are also some suspicious Odinga wins with 99% in Siaya and Home Bay. We need to increase our sample to proof that fraud took place there as well.
Methodology
| Interviews | 23-31 July 2022 |
| Geography | Since Whatsapp penetration is not equal across Kenya, ‘zone’ results are weighted by the number of registered voters. |
| Data collection | Randomly constructed Whatsapp numbers with Kenyan mobile operators |
| Sample size | 450 WhatsApp users |
| Statistical error | 4% |
| Client | None |
We asked the following questions:
- May we know your age?
- Gender (male/female)?
- Which county of Kenya do you vote in?
- Who did you vote for in the election of 8 August 2017?
- In the next elections, will you vote for Raila Odinga, William Ruto, David Waihiga Mwaure or George Wajackoyah?
- Does IEBC organize free and fair elections? (yes/no)
The following 9 geographical zones have been used. There are the same as the ones used by TIFA.
| Zone | Registered Voters | |
| Coast | 1963144 | 8.88% |
| Northern | 1441245 | 6.52% |
| Mt Kenya | 4716120 | 21.34% |
| Lower Eastern | 1699724 | 7.69% |
| Central Rift | 3267271 | 14.78% |
| South Rift | 862057 | 3.90% |
| Nyanza | 3120732 | 14.12% |
| Nairobi | 2415310 | 10.93% |
| Western | 2616929 | 11.84% |
| Total | 22102532 |
